• 全部
主办单位:煤炭科学研究总院有限公司、中国煤炭学会学术期刊工作委员会
恒温式及绝热式量热法测定煤炭发热量的实验对比研究
  • Title

    Experimental comparative study on determination of calorific value of coalby isothermal calorimetry and adiabatic calorimetry

  • 作者

    龚婉莉

  • Author

    GONG Wanli

  • 单位

    煤炭科学技术研究院有限公司国家煤炭质量检验检测中心

  • Organization
    China Coal Research Institute Corporation Ltd.
    National Coal Quality Inspection and Testing Center
  • 摘要
    煤炭发热量是评价燃料煤品质的重要指标及煤炭计价的主要依据,而恒温式与绝热式量热法由于外筒的控温方式和结果计算方法不同,需对其测定精密度与准确度进行实验对比研究,以期对2种方法测定煤炭发热量的实际应用具有指导意义。应用有证煤标准物质及日常检测样品对IKAC6000全能型自动热量计恒温模式及绝热模式下测定煤炭发热量的准确度及精密度进行评价,并从环境温度、热容量标定、充氧时间及充氧压力、仪器维护保养等方面探讨2种模式测定注意事项。结果表明,IKAC6000全能型量热仪恒温模式及绝热模式下的仪器热容量标定结果均符合国标要求;有证煤标准物质及日常煤样的干基高位发热量重复测定标准差均小于国家标准规定的重复测定标准差;2种模式下测定的干基高位发热量结果差值95%置信区间为-84~137J/g,2种模式下的测定结果没有系统性误差,显示出较高的精密度及准确度。
  • Abstract
    The calorific value of coal is an important index to evaluate the quality of coal, as well as the main basisof coal valuation. The isothermal calorimetry and adiabatic calorimetry are different due to the temperature controlmethod and calculation method of the results of the outer cylinder. It is necessary to compare the precision and accu⁃racy of the 2 methods in order to guide the practical application of calorific value of coal measurement. The accuracyand precision of isothermal mode and adiabatic mode of IKA C6000 global standard calorimeter were evaluated by u⁃sing certified standard coal samples and daily testing samples. The ambient temperature, thermal capacity calibra⁃tion, filling time and filling pressure, instrument maintenance of 2 modes were discussed. The results show that, thethermal capacity calibration of IKA C6000 calorimeter in the isothermal mode and adiabatic mode can meet the re⁃quirements of the national standard. The standard deviation of dry⁃based gross calorific value of certified coal standardmaterials and coal samples are less than standard deviation specified in the national standard. The 95% confidence in⁃terval between the dry⁃based gross calorific value in both 2 modes is -84 ~ 137 J/ g. The test results of 2 workingmodes have no systematic error, and it shows high precision and accuracy. It has important reference value for thedetermination of coal calorific value and the practical application of the 2 types of calorimeter.
  • 关键词

    煤炭发热量恒温式量热法绝热式量热法精密度准确度热容量标定控温方式

  • KeyWords

    coal; calorific value; isothermal mode; adiabatic mode; precision; accuracy; thermal capacity cali⁃bration; temperature control method

  • 基金项目(Foundation)
    天地科技股份有限公司科技创新创业资金青年资助项目(2022-2-TD-QN003)
  • DOI
  • 引用格式
    龚婉莉. 恒温式及绝热式量热法测定煤炭发热量的实验对比研究 [J]. 煤质技术, 2023, 38 (4): 86-90.
  • Citation
    GONG Wanli. Experimental comparative study on determination of calorific value of coal by isothermal calorimetryand adiabatic calorimetry [J]. Coal Quality Technology, 2023, 38 (4): 86-90.
  • 相关文章
相关问题
立即提问

主办单位:煤炭科学研究总院有限公司 中国煤炭学会学术期刊工作委员会

©版权所有2015 煤炭科学研究总院有限公司 地址:北京市朝阳区和平里青年沟东路煤炭大厦 邮编:100013
京ICP备05086979号-16  技术支持:云智互联
Baidu
map